The topic is focused but lacks direction. Sources More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books.
APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography. The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
Cites some data obtained from other sources. The topic is not clearly defined. Novice Integration of Knowledge The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
All web sites utilized are authoritative. Does not cite sources. Topic focus The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Sometimes ties together information from all sources.
Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis. All web sites utilized are credible.
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course. Citations Cites all data obtained from other sources.
Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.
Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no errors Evidence of four Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less Absent.
Research Paper Grading Rubric Name: Course: Date: (The Psychology Department at San José State University is acknowledged for the basic structure of this form.) CATEGORY Unacceptable (Below Standards) Acceptable (Meets Standards) Good (Occasionally.
Term Paper Grading Rubric for Leadership and Character Development Guidelines for writing college and seminary-level term papers.
If the paper does not follow these rules, the following points will be lost. Points RUBRIC FOR GRADING RESEARCH PAPERS.
The organization, elements of research report/paper writing, grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling of a written piece are scored in this rubric. Rubric for Papers in English Composition (A) High Proficiency (B) Good Proficiency (C) Minimal Proficiency (D or F) Non-proficiency Ideas.
When grading a research paper, if the author has clearly reinforced all of their claims with sources, they would earn a three in this category. Research Paper Rubric Examples Next Lesson.Download